Articles Posted in Unemployment Discrimination

Andreas Klinke Johannsen [CC BY-SA 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/)], via FlickrAlthough we keep hearing that the economy is improving, many people in New York City and around the country continue to be without work. In a cruel twist, it can be more difficult for a person to find a job the longer they remain unemployed. New York City amended its anti-discrimination law in 2013 to prohibit employers from discriminating in hiring based on a person’s employment status. Other jurisdictions have enacted laws addressing bias against unemployed people, but so far few are as far-reaching as New York City’s law. Federal law does not expressly protect the unemployed, but the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has considered the issue, and it offers guidance on how federal law may assist some people who believe their lack of employment led to the loss of a job opportunity.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, about 7.9 million people were unemployed in the U.S. in December 2015, a rate of five percent. This rate had not changed in three months, but it was down 0.6 percent from one year earlier. About 2.1 million people, or 26.3 percent, had been out of work for at least 27 weeks. This is less than half the number of long-term unemployed reported by the Washington Post—4.7 million—in April 2013, but it is still a considerable number of people who have been seeking a job for six months or longer. In an often subtle form of discrimination, many employers simply will not consider an applicant who has been out of work for a long time.

Federal law prohibits employment discrimination based on “race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1). Discrimination based on age, disability, and other factors is unlawful in certain circumstances under other federal statutes. New York state law includes protections for these categories, as well as others like sexual orientation and marital status. N.Y. Exec. L. § 296(a). None of these statutes specifically mentions unemployment.

Continue reading

niekverlaan [Public domain, CC0 1.0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.en)], via PixabayThe United States is, in many ways, still recovering from the economic crisis that began in 2008, with millions of people still unemployed or underemployed. Unfortunately, finding a job seems to become harder the longer a person is without a job. Many employers seem not to want to hire people who have been out of work for long periods of time. Unemployment therefore becomes a vicious cycle, from which many people cannot escape. Several states have enacted laws against job advertisements that include current employment as a requirement. New York City has gone a step further. It amended the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) in 2013 to prohibit employers from discriminating based on an applicant’s employment status.

According to the Washington Post, in April 2013 about 4.7 million people had been out of work for at least six months. Research indicated that a substantial number of employers would not consider resumes submitted by people with six months or more of unemployment, regardless of their experience or other qualifications. The White House has called on businesses to stop discriminating based on a lack of employment, and it has sought commitments from companies to adopt new hiring practices. Some state and local governments have turned to legislation to address the problem.

New Jersey was the first state to pass a law against unemployment discrimination in 2011, although its law is limited in scope. Advertisements for job vacancies may not state that current employment is required for the job, or that an employer will only consider applications from people who are currently employed. N.J. Rev. Stat. § 34:8B-1. The law only allows civil penalties for violations and expressly states that it does not authorize private causes of action by job applicants. Id. at § 34:8B-2. The law survived a court challenge claiming that it violates the First Amendment’s free speech protections. N.J. Dept. of Labor & Workforce Dev. v. Crest Ultrasonics, 82 A.2d 258 (N.J. App. 2014).

Continue reading

Contact Information